(no subject)
Jul. 21st, 2009 01:33 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

You probably didn't think I meant it literally did you?
This started out as a test for a moosebot in flight but not in aerial mode, then it turned into a personal challenge in lighting. Though I should find one wing attachment configuration and stick to it, the idea that different moosebots have different wing set ups is growing on me.

Sulky Moosebot.
Hello moosie...
on 2009-07-27 12:13 am (UTC)Different wing arrangements could be attractive, even though group piccys might be hell because of that. I love what you've done with the lighting, but anything more I could say would be moot since I have no idea how to work lighting myself.
Re: Hello moosie...
on 2009-07-28 03:31 am (UTC)Actually in my case, that sort of thing will most likely make it easier as drawing the exact same thing over and over tends to bore me. And no expertise is really needed, the praise works just fine. ^_^ *noms praise*
no subject
on 2009-07-30 05:34 am (UTC)Why is that the bigger/more intimidating something is, the cuter it is when it pouts? *offers sulky moosebot energon goodies*
no subject
on 2009-08-04 02:51 am (UTC)Thanks to your comment, and discovery's Shark Week I am now imagining a pouting Great White. Though I am tempted to draw a sulking combined gestalt despite the many other pictures I've started and are wasting away in my unfinished works folder.
no subject
on 2009-08-27 01:28 pm (UTC)Predaking! No, wait, Abominus. Or...or, well, you could always make a whole range of emoticons with every combined gestalt out there. And do you realize how many combined forms (http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Category:Combined_forms) there are?
no subject
on 2009-09-01 02:21 pm (UTC)*looks at list in dismay* I lost an entire afternoon going through that page, and I didn't even get through half of them. *points accusingly* You're an enabler plain and simple.
Don't stop.